# Evaluation — Attempt 2

## Overall Verdict: PASS

## Overall Assessment
The responsive fix resolves the mobile clipping without weakening the approved desktop composition. The live clock now reads as a deliberate editorial feature at both sizes: prominent, church-specific, and compact enough to keep the check-in form close to the fold.

## Scores
| Criterion | Score | Status | Weight | Notes |
|-----------|-------|--------|--------|-------|
| Design Quality | 2/3 | PASS | HIGH | The photo-led welcome, brass divider, cream clock text, and paper form remain cohesive across desktop and mobile. |
| Originality | 2/3 | PASS | HIGH | The clock is integrated into the photographic narrative rather than placed in a generic card or dashboard widget. |
| Craft | 2/3 | PASS | MEDIUM | Full time and date are now visible at the mobile breakpoint with clean spacing, while desktop alignment and hierarchy remain unchanged. |
| Functionality | 2/3 | PASS | MEDIUM | Time/date are visible in both captures; the clock advances between fresh captures, Africa/Accra formatting remains explicit, and the background, member link, GPS auto-state, and form remain intact. |

## What's Working Well
- At desktop width, the clock retains the balanced position beneath the short welcome line; no large header-to-copy void has returned.
- At the mobile breakpoint, the complete `05:39:43 PM` time and `Wednesday, 5 August 2026` date are visible above the form with clear separation.
- The form begins immediately after the photographic header, preserving a useful near-the-fold check-in action without overlapping the clock.
- Tabular numerals prevent visual width jitter, while the modest mobile scale keeps the seconds readable without dominating the heading.
- The background photograph renders at both sizes, the desktop Member Portal link remains present, GPS automatically reaches a clear permission state, and the member identity form remains usable.

## Issues Found
No blocking visual or functional issues were found in the requested clock addition.

## Priority Fixes for Next Attempt
None required.

## Should the next attempt REFINE or PIVOT?
Neither. The implementation meets the brief and is ready to ship.
